The claimed “fact” that decay rates have always been constant is actually an inference based on a uniformitarian assumption.
It is true that radioisotope decay rates are stable today and are not largely affected by external conditions like change in temperature and pressure, but that does not mean that the rate has always been constant.
The method of calculating radiometric dates is like using an hourglass.
You can use the hourglass to tell time if you know several things: the amount of sand in the top of the hourglass when it started flowing, the rate that the sand flows through the hole in the middle, and that the quantity of sand in each chamber has not been tampered with.
Knowing this first: that scoffers will come in the last days, walking according to their own lusts, and saying, “Where is the promise of His coming?
For since the fathers fell asleep, all things continue as they were from the beginning of creation.” For this they willfully forget: that by the word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth standing out of water and in the water, by which the world that then existed perished, being flooded with water.
A fear of God and reverence for His Word is the beginning of wisdom.
Starting with the Bible and developing a model for dating events in earth history will lead us to the truth.Far from being data, these dates are actually interpretations of the data.As discussed before, the assumptions influence the interpretation of the data.Recent research by a team of creation scientists known as the RATE (arth) group has demonstrated the unreliability of radiometric dating techniques.Even the use of isochron dating, which is supposed to eliminate some initial condition assumptions, produces dates that are not reliable.Relative ages are assigned to rocks based on the idea that rock layers lower in the strata were deposited before rock layers that are higher.